2006/11/30 by S. J. van Enk, Norbert Lütkenhaus, N. Lutkenhaus +1 · 7 citations
Computer Science · Physics and Astronomy · #Computer science #Multipartite entanglement #Physics #Quantum #Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture #Quantum Information and Cryptography #Quantum Mechanics and Applications #Quantum entanglement #Quantum mechanics #Squashed entanglement #Theoretical computer science #cond-mat.other #quant-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.052318
published as Phys. Rev. A 75, 052318 (2007) · 15 pages
arxiv created 2007/03/28 · openalex publication_date 2007/05/15 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
We give an overview of different types of entanglement that can be generated in experiments, as well as of various protocols that can be used to verify or quantify entanglement. We propose several criteria that, we argue, should be applied to experimental entanglement verification procedures. Explicit examples demonstrate that not following these criteria will tend to result in overestimating the amount of entanglement generated in an experiment or in inferring entanglement when there is none. We distinguish protocols meant to refute or eliminate hidden-variable models from those meant to verify entanglement.