vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Generalized Chaplygin Gas Models Tested with Type Ia Supernovae

2004/03/31 by Marek Biesiada, Włodzimierz Godłowski, Wlodzimierz Godlowski +2
Physics and Astronomy · #Cosmology and Gravitation Theories #Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena #Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae #astro-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.1086/427863

published as Astrophys.J. 622 (2005) 28 · 54 pages 29 figures improved version analysis flat prior relaxed high redshift Riess SNIa sample included

arxiv created 2004/10/29 · openalex publication_date 2005/03/20 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31

Abstract

The generalized Chaplygin gas (GCG), with the equation of state p = - A /ρ α , was recently proposed as a candidate for dark energy in the universe. In this paper we confront the GCG with Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) data using available samples. Specifically, we have tested the GCG cosmology in three different classes of models with (1) Ω m = 0.3 and Ω Ch = 0.7, (2) Ω m = 0.05 and Ω Ch = 0.95, and (3) Ω m = 0 and Ω Ch = 1, as well as a model without prior assumptions on Ω m . The best-fit models are obtained by minimizing the χ 2 function. We supplement our analysis with confidence intervals in the ( A 0 , α)-plane by marginalizing the probability density functions (pdf's) over the remaining parameters assuming uniform priors. We have also derived one-dimensional pdf's for Ω Ch obtained from joint marginalization over α and A 0 . The maximum value of such a pdf provides the most probable value of Ω Ch within the full class of GCG models. The general conclusion is that SN Ia data give support to the Chaplygin gas (with α = 1). However, a noticeable preference for A 0 -values close to 1 means that the α dependence becomes insignificant. This is reflected in one-dimensional pdf's for α that turned out to be flat, meaning that the power of the present supernova data to discriminate between various GCG models (differing by α) is weak. Extending our analysis by relaxing the prior assumption of the flatness of the universe leads to the result that even though the best-fit values of Ω k are formally nonzero, they are still close to the flat case. Our results show clearly that in GCG cosmology, distant (i.e., z > 1) supernovae should be brighter than in the ΛCDM model. Therefore, one can expect that future supernova experiments (e.g., SNAP ) having access to higher redshifts will eventually resolve the issue of whether the dark energy content of the universe could be described as a Chaplygin gas. Moreover, it would be possible to differentiate between models with various values of the α-parameter and/or discriminate between GCG, Cardassian, and ΛCDM models. This discriminative power of the forthcoming mission has been demonstrated on simulated SNAP data.

Citations