2004/01/14 by G. Altavilla, G. Fiorentino, M. Marconi +8 · 1 citation
Physics and Astronomy · #Astronomy and Astrophysical Research #Calibration #Cepheid variable #Cosmic distance ladder #Galaxy #Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae #Hubble's law #Metallicity #Photometry (optics) #Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies #Supernova #astro-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07616.x
published as Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 349 (2004) 1344 · 19 pages, 9 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS
arxiv created 2004/01/14 · openalex publication_date 2004/04/01 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05
We investigate how a different calibration of the Cepheid period–luminosity (PL) relation, taking into account metallicity corrections, affects the absolute magnitude calibration of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) and, in turn, the determination of the Hubble constant H0. We use SN Ia light curves from the literature and previously unpublished data to establish the MB–Δm15(B) relation, and calibrate the zero point by means of nine SNe Ia with Cepheid-measured distances. This relation is then used to establish the Hubble diagram, and in turn to derive H0. In the attempt to correct for the host-galaxy extinction, we find that the data suggest a value for the total to selective absorption ratio of RB= 3.5, which is smaller than the standard value for our own Galaxy of RB= 4.315. Depending on the metallicity correction for the Cepheid PL relation, the value of RB, and SN sample selection criteria, the value of the Hubble constant H0 takes a value in the range 68–74 km s−1 Mpc−1, with associated uncertainties of the order of 10 per cent. Unpublished photometry is also presented for 18 SNe of our sample (1991S, 1991T, 1992A, 1992K, 1993H, 1993L, 1994D, 1994M, 1994ae, 1995D, 1995ac, 1995bd, 1996bo, 1997bp, 1997br, 1999aa, 1999dk, 2000cx). These data are the results of a long-standing effort in supernova monitoring at ESO – La Silla and Asiago observatories.