Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review

2007/01/01 by Romina Pace, Pierre Pluye, Gillian Bartlett +5 · 39 citations
Engineering · Mathematics · #Advanced Theoretical and Applied Studies in Material Sciences and Geometry #Statistical and numerical algorithms #Aerospace Engineering and Control Systems

paper · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.07.002

Abstract

The MMAT is unique, thus the reliability of the pilot MMAT is promising, and encourages further development.

Cited by

• Systematic mixed studies reviews: Updating results on the reliability and efficiency of the mixed methods appraisal tool
• Patient participation in nursing bedside handover: A systematic mixed-methods review
• A systematic review and meta‐analysis of digital interventions targeted at individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD), emotionally unstable personality disorder (EUPD), and related symptoms
• The ABC of systematic literature review: the basic methodological guidance for beginners
• Combining the Power of Stories and the Power of Numbers: Mixed Methods Research and Mixed Studies Reviews
• The relationships between school climate and adolescent mental health and wellbeing: A systematic literature review
• Psychological and social impacts of frontotemporal dementia on caregivers and family members – A systematic review
• Women’s experiences and satisfaction with having a cesarean birth: An integrative review
• Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study
• Barriers and Motivators of Physical Activity Participation in Middle-Aged and Older Adults—A Systematic Review
• School partnered approaches to emotionally based school avoidance in UK primary and secondary school‐age learners: A systematic review
• Implementation Science in School-Based, Universal-Level Intervention Research: A Scoping Review
• The adaptation of self-report measures to the needs of people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review.
• Characteristics of critical thinking education to children: a systematic review
• Factors influencing adherence to cancer treatment in older adults with cancer: a systematic review. [europepmc]
• Implementation of the Crisis Resolution Team model in adult mental health settings: a systematic review. [europepmc]
• Factors affecting uptake and adherence to breast cancer chemoprevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [europepmc]
• Patient Preferences and Shared Decision Making in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review of the Literature. [europepmc]
• How does age-related macular degeneration affect real-world visual ability and quality of life? A systematic review. [europepmc]
• A Global Review of HIV Self-testing: Themes and Implications. [europepmc]
• Access barriers to obstetric care at health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa-a systematic review. [europepmc]
• What does the general public understand about prevention and treatment of dementia? A systematic review of population-based surveys. [europepmc]
• Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement With Remote Measurement Technology for Managing Health: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Findings. [europepmc]
• Unmet care needs of advanced cancer patients and their informal caregivers: a systematic review. [europepmc]
• A Systematic Review of Sexual and Reproductive Health Knowledge, Experiences and Access to Services among Refugee, Migrant and Displaced Girls and Young Women in Africa. [europepmc]
• Factors associated with health service utilisation for common mental disorders: a systematic review. [europepmc]
• Barriers to access and utilization of emergency obstetric care at health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of literature. [europepmc]
• How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care. [europepmc]
• Quality of life versus length of life considerations in cancer patients: A systematic literature review. [europepmc]
• Risk of bias tools in systematic reviews of health interventions: an analysis of PROSPERO-registered protocols. [europepmc]
• Adoption, implementation and sustainability of school-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions in real-world settings: a systematic review. [europepmc]
• Electronic Consultation in Primary Care Between Providers and Patients: Systematic Review. [europepmc]
• Psychological, social and contextual factors across recovery stages following a sport-related knee injury: a scoping review. [europepmc]
• Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals. [europepmc]
• Quality assessment with diverse studies (QuADS): an appraisal tool for methodological and reporting quality in systematic reviews of mixed- or multi-method studies. [europepmc]
• Social determinants of COVID-19 incidence and outcomes: A rapid review. [europepmc]
• Physical activity motives, barriers, and preferences in people with obesity: A systematic review. [europepmc]
• The role of urbanisation in the spread of Aedes mosquitoes and the diseases they transmit-A systematic review. [europepmc]
• Access to health services among culturally and linguistically diverse populations in the Australian universal health care system: issues and challenges. [europepmc]

Related

• Improving the content validity of the mixed methods appraisal tool: a modified e-Delphi study
• Combining the Power of Stories and the Power of Numbers: Mixed Methods Research and Mixed Studies Reviews
• Mixed-Methods Research Methodologies
• Quality Appraisal Tools for Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-Methods Studies: A Review and a Brief New Checklist
• Combined background information for meta-analysis evaluation