2010/02/01 by Philippe De Brabanter · 1 citation
Arts and Humanities · #Linguistics and Discourse Analysis #Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation #Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/j.1749-818x.2009.00185.x
openalex publication_date 2010/02/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Abstract This study examines a type of quotation –‘hybrid quotations’– that has received quite a bit of attention from philosophers, semanticists and pragmaticists over the last dozen years or so. Theoretical debates have centred on the question whether the contribution to content of such quotations is semantic in essence, or pragmatic. After presenting prototypical examples of ‘mixed quotation’ and ‘scare quoting’, the two subtypes of hybrid quotations usually distinguished by specialists, I outline the two main ways of approaching them – as semantic or pragmatic phenomena – and highlight their strengths and weaknesses. After that, I present several empirical facts that may help one to decide which sort of theory is more likely to prevail eventually. In the process, the reader can get acquainted with some of the remarkable variety that hybrid quotation offers.