vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Strong decays of charmed baryons in heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory

2006/10/31 by Hai-Yang Cheng, Chun-Khiang Chua · 156 citations
Physics and Astronomy · #Baryon #Charmed baryons #Chiral perturbation theory #Excited state #Hadron #High-Energy Particle Collisions Research #Lambda #Nuclear physics #Particle physics #Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies #Physics #Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions #Quantum mechanics #Quark #Quark model #Quarkonium #hep-ex #hep-ph

paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.014006

published in Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields 75(1) (American Physical Society) · 22 pages, the coupling g_2 is slightly modified, Tables 5 and 6 are updated; version to appear in PRD

arxiv created 2006/12/20 · openalex publication_date 2007/01/08 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

Strong decays of charmed baryons are analyzed in the framework of heavy hadron chiral perturbation theory (HHChPT) in which heavy quark symmetry and chiral symmetry are synthesized. HHChPT works excellently for describing the strong decays of s-wave charmed baryons. For L=1 orbitally excited states, two of the unknown couplings, namely, h2 and h10, are determined from the resonant \ensuremathΛc+\ensuremathπ\ensuremathπ mode produced in the \ensuremathΛc(2593) decay and the width of \ensuremathΣc(2800), respectively. Predictions for the strong decays of the p-wave charmed baryon states \ensuremathΛc(2625), \ensuremathΞc(2790) and \ensuremathΞc(2815) are presented. Since the decay \ensuremathΛc(2593)+\ensuremath→\ensuremathΛc+\ensuremathπ\ensuremathπ receives nonresonant contributions, our value for h2 is smaller than the previous estimates. We also discuss the first positive-parity excited charmed baryons. We conjecture that the charmed baryon \ensuremathΛc(2880) with JP=(5)/(2)\genfrac0+ is an admixture of \ensuremathΛc2((5)/(2)\genfrac0+) with an \stackrel\texttildelow\ensuremathΛc3^\ensuremath'\ensuremath'((5)/(2)\genfrac0+); both are L=2 orbitally excited states. The potential model suggests JP=(5)/(2)\genfrac0\ensuremath- or (3)/(2)\genfrac0+ for \ensuremathΛc(2940)+. Measurements of the ratio of \ensuremathΣc*\ensuremathπ/\ensuremathΣc\ensuremathπ will enable us to discriminate the JP assignments for \ensuremathΛc(2940). We advocate that the JP quantum numbers of \ensuremathΞc(2980) and \ensuremathΞc(3077) are (1)/(2)\genfrac0+ and (5)/(2)\genfrac0+, respectively. Under this JP assignment, it is easy to understand why \ensuremathΞc(2980) is broader than \ensuremathΞc(3077).

Citations

Cited by