vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

(Pseudo)issue of the conformal frame revisited

2006/12/12 by Valerio Faraoni, Shahn Nadeau · 20 citations
Mathematics · Physics and Astronomy · #Advanced Differential Geometry Research #Affine transformation #Black Holes and Theoretical Physics #Classical mechanics #Computer science #Conformal gravity #Conformal map #Conformal symmetry #Cosmological constant #Cosmology and Gravitation Theories #Einstein #Equivalence (formal languages) #Frame (networking) #Geometry #Gravitational singularity #Mathematical physics #Mathematics #Parametrization (atmospheric modeling) #Physics #Pure mathematics #Quantum mechanics #Scalar (mathematics) #Theoretical physics #astro-ph #gr-qc #hep-th

paper · pdf · doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.023501

published as Phys.Rev.D75:023501,2007 · 29 pages, latex, to appear in Phys. Rev. D

arxiv created 2006/12/12 · openalex publication_date 2007/01/02 · arxiv updated 2009/12/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

The issue of the equivalence between Jordan and Einstein conformal frames in scalar-tensor gravity is revisited, with the emphasis on implementing running units in the latter. The lack of affine parametrization for timelike worldlines and the cosmological constant problem in the Einstein frame are clarified, and a paradox in the literature about cosmological singularities appearing only in one frame is solved. While, classically, the two conformal frames are physically equivalent, they seem to be inequivalent at the quantum level.

Citations

Cited by