2026/01/31 by F. A. Chishtie, K. Roberts, N. Jisrawi +5
Engineering · Physics and Astronomy · #Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies #Mechanical and Optical Resonators #Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics #cond-mat.mes-hall #cond-mat.mtrl-sci #quant-ph
paper · pdf · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2026.112238
published as Results in Engineering, Volume 32, 2026, 112238 · 21 pages, 10 figures, published version at Results in Engineering journal
openalex publication_date 2026/07/29 · openalex created_date 2026/07/30 · arxiv created 2026/07/31 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01 · arxiv updated 2026/08/04
We establish a rigorous mathematical framework connecting graphene nanoribbon quantum sensing to the Lambert W function through the finite square well (FSW) analogy. The Lambert W function, defined as the inverse of f(W)=WeW, provides exact analytical solutions to transcendental equations governing quantum confinement. Operating near the branch point singularity at z=-1/e yields sensitivity enhancement factors scaling as (z-zc)-1/2, achieving 35-fold enhancement when the operating point lies within δ=0.001 of the branch point. Comprehensive numerical verification confirms: (i) all seven bound states for strength parameter R=10 satisfy the constraint u2+v2=R2 to machine precision; (ii) the theoretical band gap formula Eg=2πℏ vF/(3W) is analytically equivalent to the independently determined empirical relation Eg=1.38/W~eV⋅nm, establishing the validity of the FSW-GNR analogy; (iii) a universal sensitivity factorization SX = Gk ⋅ η\rm enh ⋅ PX applies across biomedical (SARS-CoV-2, inflammatory markers, cancer biomarkers), environmental (CO2, CH4, NO2, N2O, H2O), and physical (strain, magnetic field, temperature) sensing modalities. This unified framework provides analytically predictable design principles for next-generation graphene quantum sensors. The framework is analytic and predictive rather than microscopic or experimental: band-structure and adsorption parameters are taken as inputs from tight-binding, first-principles, and experimental sources, and the framework returns closed-form sensitivity and design relations built upon them. Reported detection limits are labelled throughout as either literature-demonstrated device values or values predicted by the present framework.