Can they trust us? The relevance debate and the perceived trustworthiness of the management scholarly community

2022/01/05 by Dominika Latusek, Przemysław Hensel, Przemysław G. Hensel · 1 voice
Business, Management and Accounting · #Accounting and Organizational Management #Management Theory and Practice #Management and Organizational Studies

paper · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2021.101193

openalex publication_date 2022/01/05 · crossref created 2022/01/05 · crossref issued 2022/03/01 · crossref published 2022/03/01 · crossref published-print 2022/03/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref deposited 2025/10/16 · openalex updated_date 2025/11/06 · crossref indexed 2026/06/01

Citations

• The myopia of learning
• Applications of Operations Research in the Air Transport Industry
• The modular nature of trustworthiness detection.
• Us and Them: Intergroup Failures of Empathy
• AFFECT- AND COGNITION-BASED TRUST AS FOUNDATIONS FOR INTERPERSONAL COOPERATION IN ORGANIZATIONS.
• Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance.
• Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning
• Impact and Management Research: Exploring Relationships between Temporality, Dialogue, Reflexivity and Praxis
• Supporting replication research in management journals: Qualitative analysis of editorials published between 1970 and 2015
• Should academic research be relevant and useful to practitioners? The contrasting difference between three applied disciplines
• Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world
• The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields
• Trust as a Social Reality
• An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust

Discussions

• https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2021.101193 [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]