2024/02/20 by Mariana del Carmen Aguilera‐Puga, Fabien Plisson · 1 voice
Immunology and Microbiology · Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · #Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities #Biochemical and Structural Characterization #vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
paper · pdf · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3938402/v1
openalex publication_date 2024/02/20 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/14
Abstract Machine learning models are revolutionizing our approaches to discovering and designing bioactive peptides. However, these models often need protein structure awareness, as they heavily rely on sequential data. The models excel at identifying sequences of a particular biological nature or activity, but they frequently fail to comprehend their intricate mechanism(s) of action. To solve two problems at once, we studied the mechanisms of action and structural landscape of antimicrobial peptides as (i) membrane-disrupting peptides, (ii) membrane-penetrating peptides, and (iii) protein-affine peptides. Our in-depth analysis revealed that our preliminary best-performing classifiers (86–88% accuracy) trained on datasets with an over-represented distribution of α-helical and coiled structures. Consequently, our models would predict the antimicrobial activity of these structure classes more accurately. We mitigated this structural bias by implementing two strategies: subset selection and data reduction. The former gave three structure-specific models predicting the mechanisms of action of peptide sequences likely to fold into α-helices, coils, or mixed structures. The latter depleted over-represented structures, leading to general structure-agnostic predictors.