2018/03/01 by Sarah K. Bruch, Marcia K. Meyers, Janet C. Gornick · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics #Local Government Finance and Decentralization #Social Policy and Reform Studies
paper · doi:10.1086/696132
crossref issued 2018/03/01 · crossref published 2018/03/01 · crossref published-print 2018/03/01 · openalex publication_date 2018/03/01 · crossref created 2018/03/16 · crossref deposited 2020/10/29 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref indexed 2026/07/28 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Decentralized safety net programs provide much of the social provision in the US, yet the consequences for social provision have received remarkably limited attention. In this article, we examine cross-state inequality in social safety net provision from 1994 to 2014. We ask whether programs that are more decentralized in terms of policy design are more variable across states in terms of the generosity of benefits and inclusiveness of receipt and whether there has been convergence or divergence in programs affected by the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) as well as in those that were not. We find substantial cross-state inequality in provision, with greater cross-state inequality in programs with more state discretion. In examining change over time, we find remarkable consistency in the levels of cross-state inequality; however, we also find that the devolution of authority under PRWORA increased cross-state inequality in programs affected by this legislation.