A Wider Race? Interstate Competition across Health and Welfare Programs

2004/03/31 by Michael A. Bailey, Michael Bailey, Mark Carl Rom · 1 citation
Social Sciences · #Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics #Social Policy and Reform Studies #Local Government Finance and Decentralization

paper · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00154.x

Abstract

Does interstate competition reduce welfare generosity? Most analyses of this question focus on Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) benefit levels. The welfare-reducing logic of interstate competition should apply to all redistributive programs, however. We test for competitive effects more generally, examining several measures of welfare generosity for AFDC, Medicaid, and Supplemental Security Income-State (SSI-S) policy. We find evidence of interstate competition across multiple programs and measures over which states have authority. We also find variation in the effects that is consistent with variation in political debates across the programs.

Cited by

• The Role of Policy Attributes in the Diffusion of Innovations

Related

• The Distributive Politics of Grants-in-Aid
• State Politics, Race, and “Welfare” as a Funding Stream: Cash Assistance Spending Under Temporary Assistance for Needy Families
• The Marginal Labor Supply Disincentives of Welfare: Evidence from Administrative Barriers to Participation
• Electoral competition and the welfare state
• Welfare at Risk: Distributional impact of policy interventions