2026/05/11 by Stephanie Macheras, Tess Peverill, Adam McKay +3 · 1 voice
Medicine · Neuroscience · #Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation #Traumatic Brain Injury Research #Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
paper · doi:10.1071/ib25133
openalex created_date 2026/05/11 · openalex publication_date 2026/05/11 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/18
BACKGROUND: Telehealth could expand access to specialised concussion care; however, physiotherapists report low confidence in assessing physical symptoms remotely. This study adapted measures of vestibular, oculomotor, cervical and autonomic function for telehealth delivery, and evaluated their feasibility and comparability with in-person assessment. METHODS: Using a repeated-measures design, 16 participants with concussion and 20 controls completed assessment modalities in random order (3 × 4 block randomisation). Feasibility was evaluated through completion rates, technical issues, adverse events and clinician feedback. Concurrent validity was examined using percentage agreement, Cohen's kappa, and sensitivity and specificity analyses. RESULTS: Telehealth assessment was feasible; most concussion participants and all controls completed the protocols, there were minimal technical issues, no adverse events and shorter administration times. Clinicians reported high usability and efficiency. High agreement and sensitivity were observed across vestibular, ocular convergence, autonomic and cervical range of motion measures. Nuanced assessment of ocular smooth pursuits showed lower agreement, and a potential ceiling effect on autonomic assessment was identified. CONCLUSION: This study preliminarily supports the feasibility and comparability of telehealth compared with in-person physical concussion assessments. Assessment of smooth pursuits and autonomic function require protocol refinement to enhance accuracy. Replication in larger samples is required to establish comparability.