Research productivity and novelty under different funding models: evidence from NIH-funded research projects

2025/07/01 by XU Lin-ming, Linming Xu, Buqian Li +3 · 1 voice
Decision Sciences · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Medicine · #Health and Medical Research Impacts #Innovation Policy and R&D #scientometrics and bibliometrics research

paper · doi:10.1007/s11192-025-05370-7

crossref issued 2025/07/01 · crossref published 2025/07/01 · crossref published-print 2025/07/01 · openalex publication_date 2025/07/01 · crossref published-online 2025/07/05 · crossref created 2025/07/05 · crossref deposited 2025/09/07 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · crossref indexed 2026/06/04 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23

Citations

• Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
• A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity
• How can governance change research content? Linking science policy studies to the sociology of science
• Natural language processing to identify the creation and impact of new technologies in patent text: Code, data, and new measures
• Comparing the outputs of intramural and extramural grants funded by National Institutes of Health
• The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds
• A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change

Discussions

• "競争的学外資金はより多くの論文発表と関連し、一方、安定的学内資金はより新規性の高いアウトプットに関連することが示された。" Research productivity and novelty under different funding models: evidence from NIH-funded research projects doi.org/10.1007/s111... [bsky, 1 points, 0 comments]