2025/12/16 · 1 voice
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Social Sciences · #Balkan and Eastern European Studies #Cold war #Counterintuitive #European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies #Existentialism #Nuclear Issues and Defense #Nuclear energy policy #Nuclear ethics #Nuclear terrorism #Nuclear weapon #Scrutiny
paper · doi:10.7551/mitpress/16163.001.0001
openalex publication_date 2025/12/16 · openalex created_date 2026/01/14 · openalex updated_date 2026/05/21
A sobering edited volume on how efforts to reduce nuclear weapons dangers may sometimes wind up exacerbating them. The existential risks posed to the world by nuclear weapons are growing. Efforts to halt nuclear proliferation, manage crises, promote arms control, and build alliances are all considered fundamental to reducing the likelihood of nuclear catastrophe. Yet, no tool is guaranteed to succeed and some may even have unanticipated, counterproductive consequences for international security. In a field fixated on finding solutions, Atomic Backfires, edited by Stephen Herzog, Giles David Arceneaux, and Ariel F. W. Petrovics, provocatively takes the opposite tack. An impressive group of contributors calls for close scrutiny of “standard operating procedures” in nuclear politics. They warn decision makers, scholars, and students not to lose sight of the drivers and often calamitous effects of failed nuclear policies. The volume’s authors aim to provide insights for navigating the difficult nuclear choices pursued in Washington, D.C., and other capitals around the globe. Contributors David M. Allison, Giles David Arceneaux, Sarah Bidgood, Tyler Bowen, James Cameron, Hyun-Binn Cho, Eliza Gheorghe, Rebecca Davis Gibbons, Stephen Herzog, Ulrich Kühn, Ariel F. W. Petrovics, Daniel Salisbury, Lauren Sukin, Kristin Ven Bruusgaard.