2026/07/23 by Patrick Küpper, PATRICK KUPPER, Jana Piňosová +1 · 1 voice
Environmental Science · Social Sciences · #Central European national history #Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies #Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
paper · doi:10.3828/whpeh.63913571963656
openalex publication_date 2026/07/23 · openalex created_date 2026/07/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25
This article recovers the neglected history of nature conservation in the Habsburg Monarchy and situates it within a European context. Focusing on the Monarchy’s western half (Cisleithania), we trace how debates after 1900 reached Austria’s highest politics unusually early – beginning with a 1901 Reichsrat motion and an empire-wide 1903 survey – yet failed to yield implementation. We examine why this initiative stalled, how it affected the formation of a wide-ranging conservation movement and how these trajectories shaped post-1918 policies in Austria and Czechoslovakia. Along the way, we analyse evolving concepts ( Naturdenkmal, Naturschutz, Heimatschutz ), thematic priorities and the imagined communities invoked within and across imperial, national and linguistic lines. Our account draws on contemporary newspapers, association journals and scientific publications, as well as documents from archives in Vienna, Innsbruck, Koblenz, Berlin, and Prague. It positions the Habsburg case as a critical counterpoint to the nationalist frameworks in other European countries.