vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Is R&amp;D Really That Special? A <scp>Fixed‐Cost</scp> Explanation for the Empirical Patterns of R&amp;D Firms<sup>†</sup>

2021/10/30 by Robert J. Resutek
Business, Management and Accounting · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · #Corporate Finance and Governance #Capital Investment and Risk Analysis #Financial Markets and Investment Strategies

paper · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12740

Abstract

ABSTRACT I propose an explanation for the positive relation between R&amp;D, future earnings, and future stock returns based on the fixed‐cost qualities of R&amp;D. If R&amp;D is relatively fixed over short horizons, demand shocks realized by some R&amp;D firms will push these firms into R&amp;D intensity levels that are suboptimal as common scale proxies—market equity, assets, and sales—respond more quickly to demand shocks than R&amp;D. In response, R&amp;D firms realizing negative demand shocks reduce future expenses and capital expenditures, producing higher future profitability on lower sales growth. Consistent with the fixed‐cost hypothesis, I find the higher future profits of high R&amp;D firms are explained by cost cutting, not revenue growth. Collectively, the restructuring of cost and capital structures of the subset of high R&amp;D firms realizing demand shocks explains the future profit and investment patterns of R&amp;D firms, while the fixed‐cost qualities of R&amp;D seem to explain patterns in future stock returns. My results have implications for literatures that examine how decisions on R&amp;D investment levels affect future firm performance, growth, and stock returns.

Citations

Related