2025/12/15 by Larissa Deppisch, Andreas Klärner · 1 voice · 1 citation
Social Sciences · Environmental Science · Agricultural and Biological Sciences · #Populism, Right-Wing Movements #Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies #Rural development and sustainability
paper · doi:10.1080/00343404.2025.2587811
The ‘geography of discontent’ debate argues that discontent in ‘left-behind places’ is the root of the rise of right-wing populism in rural areas. Based on a qualitative analysis of group discussions, we examine why the right-wing populist party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) is successful in some structurally weak rural areas, but not others. And why does it succeed in some structurally strong areas, yet fail in others? The derived heuristic model suggests that the interweaving of discontent with the limitation of opportunity structures and a centre-right local political climate explains high AfD vote shares in rural areas.