2014/04/30 by Melissa M. Garrido, Amy S. Kelley, Julia Paris +5 · 891 citations
Decision Sciences · Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Mathematics · Medicine · #Advanced Causal Inference Techniques #Comparative effectiveness research #Covariate #Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics #Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life #Internal medicine #Matching (statistics) #Mathematics #Medicine #Observational study #Propensity score matching #Statistics #Weighting
paper · pdf · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12182
published in Health Services Research 49(5), 1701-1720 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 2014/04/30 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/01
OBJECTIVES: To model the steps involved in preparing for and carrying out propensity score analyses by providing step-by-step guidance and Stata code applied to an empirical dataset. STUDY DESIGN: Guidance, Stata code, and empirical examples are given to illustrate (1) the process of choosing variables to include in the propensity score; (2) balance of propensity score across treatment and comparison groups; (3) balance of covariates across treatment and comparison groups within blocks of the propensity score; (4) choice of matching and weighting strategies; (5) balance of covariates after matching or weighting the sample; and (6) interpretation of treatment effect estimates. EMPIRICAL APPLICATION: We use data from the Palliative Care for Cancer Patients (PC4C) study, a multisite observational study of the effect of inpatient palliative care on patient health outcomes and health services use, to illustrate the development and use of a propensity score. CONCLUSIONS: Propensity scores are one useful tool for accounting for observed differences between treated and comparison groups. Careful testing of propensity scores is required before using them to estimate treatment effects.