1997/03/01 by Roy Lyster, Leila Ranta · 2 citations
Arts and Humanities · #Discourse Analysis in Language Studies #EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning #Second Language Learning and Teaching
paper · doi:10.1017/s0272263197001034
openalex publication_date 1997/03/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
This article presents a study of corrective feedback and learner uptake (i.e., responses to feedback) in four immersion classrooms at the primary level. Transcripts totaling 18.3 hours of classroom interaction taken from 14 subject-matter lessons and 13 French language arts lessons were analyzed using a model developed for the study and comprising the various moves in an error treatment sequence. Results include the frequency and distribution of the six different feedback types used by the four teachers, in addition to the frequency and distribution of different types of learner uptake following each feedback type. The findings indicate an overwhelming tendency for teachers to use recasts in spite of the latter's ineffectiveness at eliciting student-generated repair. Four other feedback types—elicitation, metalinguistic feedback, clarification requests, and repetition—lead to student-generated repair more successfully and are thus able to initiate what the authors characterize as the negotiation of form.