2008/09/09 by M. Ghafghazi, Mohsen Ghafghazi, D. Shuttle +1 · 46 citations
Engineering · Mathematics · #Composite material #Compressibility #Cone penetration test #Elasticity (physics) #Engineering #Geology #Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics #Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization #Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures #Geotechnical engineering #Lateral earth pressure #Limiting #Materials science #Mathematics #Mechanics #Penetration (warfare) #Penetration test #Physics #Soil science #Soil water #Void ratio
paper · doi:10.1680/geot.2008.58.8.623
published in Géotechnique 58(8), 623-634 (ICE Publishing)
openalex publication_date 2008/09/09 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/30
The cone penetration test (CPT) is a widely used test for determining in situ state (or density) of cohesionless soils. The reliability of the estimated in situ state parameter, ψ, is constrained, however, because intrinsic soil properties affect the CPT response (often called a ‘compressibility’ effect). Here, the limiting cavity expansion pressure is used as an analogue for CPT tip resistance, q c , to determine the effect of intrinsic soil properties on the q c versus ψ relation. The limiting cavity pressure is computed by a large strain finite element code using a critical state-based soil model. This cavity expansion idealisation is then scaled to reference calibration chamber data with a universal shape function. The approach leads to a practically simple and theoretically sound method in which results from a few triaxial tests allow calculation of a sand-specific CPT q c –ψ calibration. The method is tested against published reference studies on nine sands and recovers ψ with a precision in void ratio of Δe = ± 0·04 at approximately 80% confidence. This accuracy for soils with elasticity measured by bender elements is considerably greater, Δe = ± 0·04 being obtained at approximately 95% confidence.