vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Professional Development Research

2013/11/07 by Heather C. Hill, Mary Beisiegel, Robin Jacob · 358 citations
Decision Sciences · Engineering · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Best practice #Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion #Computer science #Educational Assessment and Improvement #Educational research #Engineering #Engineering ethics #Key (lock) #Knowledge base #Management science #Pedagogy #Political science #Professional development #Psychology #Teacher Education and Leadership Studies

paper · doi:10.3102/0013189x13512674

published in Educational Researcher 42(9), 476-487 (SAGE Publishing)

openalex publication_date 2013/11/07 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Commentaries regarding appropriate methods for researching professional development have been a frequent topic in recent issues of Educational Researcher as well as other venues. In this article, the authors extend this discussion by observing that randomized trials of specific professional development programs have not enhanced our knowledge of effective program characteristics, leaving practitioners without guidance with regard to best practices. In response, the authors propose that scholars should execute more rigorous comparisons of professional development designs at the initial stages of program development and use information derived from these studies to build a professional knowledge base. The authors illustrate with examples of both a proposed study and reviews of evidence on key questions in the literature.

Citations

Cited by

Related