1996/11/01 by RICHARD B. FELSON, Richard B. Felson, Steven F. Messner +1 · 158 citations
Environmental Science · Medicine · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Computer science #Computer security #Crime Patterns and Interventions #Criminology #Human factors and ergonomics #Logistic regression #Medical emergency #Medicine #Poison control #Psychology #Set (abstract data type) #Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence #Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
paper · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1996.tb01218.x
published in Criminology 34(4), 519-545 (Wiley)
openalex publication_date 1996/11/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22
This research explores the utility of the notion of lethal intent for understanding the outcomes of injurious attacks. We suggest that assailants sometimes kill rather than merely injure victims to avoid either retaliation or criminal prosecution. We hypothesize that, for these tactical reasons, offenders will be more likely to kill when they have no accomplices, when their victims are male or black, and when the victim can identify them. These hypotheses are tested with a merged data set containing information on homicides and nonlethal victimizations involving robbery, rape, and pure assault. The results of multiple logistic regression analyses are largely consistent with theoretical expectations.