vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Sampling From Multiscale Densities With Delayed Rejection Generalized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo

2024/06/04 by Gilad Turok, Chirag Modi, Turok, Gilad +3 · 3 citations
Computer Science · Engineering · Mathematics · #Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering #Applied mathematics #Hamiltonian (control theory) #Hybrid Monte Carlo #Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis #Importance sampling #Markov Chains and Monte Carlo Methods #Markov chain Monte Carlo #Mathematical optimization #Mathematics #Monte Carlo method #Monte Carlo method in statistical physics #Physics #Rejection sampling #Sampling (signal processing) #Statistical physics #Statistics

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.02741

published in arXiv (Cornell University) (Cornell University)

openalex publication_date 2024/06/04 · openalex created_date 2024/06/08 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) is the mainstay of applied Bayesian inference for differentiable models. However, HMC still struggles to sample from hierarchical models that induce densities with multiscale geometry: a large step size is needed to efficiently explore low curvature regions while a small step size is needed to accurately explore high curvature regions. We introduce the delayed rejection generalized HMC (DR-G-HMC) sampler that overcomes this challenge by employing dynamic step size selection, inspired by differential equation solvers. In generalized HMC, each iteration does a single leapfrog step. DR-G-HMC sequentially makes proposals with geometrically decreasing step sizes upon rejection of earlier proposals. This simulates Hamiltonian dynamics that can adjust its step size along a (stochastic) Hamiltonian trajectory to deal with regions of high curvature. DR-G-HMC makes generalized HMC competitive by decreasing the number of rejections which otherwise cause inefficient backtracking and prevents directed movement. We present experiments to demonstrate that DR-G-HMC (1) correctly samples from multiscale densities, (2) makes generalized HMC methods competitive with the state of the art No-U-Turn sampler, and (3) is robust to tuning parameters.

Cited by

Related