vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Performance evaluation aodv, dymo, olsr and zrpad hoc routing protocol for ieee 802.11 mac and 802.11 dcf in vanet using qualnet

2012/02/08 by Manish Sharma, Sharma, Manish, Gurpadam Singh +1 · 1 citation
Computer Science · Engineering · #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Mobile Ad Hoc Networks #Networking and Internet Architecture (cs.NI) #Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs) #Wireless Networks and Protocols #cs.NI

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1202.1720

12 Pages. 5 Figures; International Journal on AdHoc Networking Systems (IJANS) Vol. 2, No. 1, January 2012

arxiv created 2012/02/08 · openalex publication_date 2012/02/08 · arxiv updated 2012/02/09 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

In VANET high speed is the real characteristics which leads to frequent breakdown, interference etc. Therefore Performance of adhoc routing protocols is helpful to improve the Quality of Service (QOS). In this paper we studied various adhoc routing protocols, Reactive, Proactive & Hybrid, taking in to consideration parameters like speed, altitude, mobility etc in real VANET scenario. The AODV and DYMO (Reactive), OLSR (Proactive) and ZRP (hybrid) protocols are compared for IEEE 802.11(MAC) and IEEE 802.11(DCF) standard using Qualnet as a Simulation tool. Since IEEE 802.11, covers both physical and data link layer. Hence performance of the protocols in these layers helps to make a right selection of Protocol for high speed mobility. Varying parameters of VANET shows that in the real traffic scenarios proactive protocol performs more efficiently for IEEE 802.11 (MAC) and IEEE 802.11(DCF).

Cited by

Related