vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Self-supervised Robust Object Detectors from Partially Labelled Datasets

2020/05/23 by Mahdieh Abbasi, Abbasi, Mahdieh, Denis Laurendeau +4
Computer Science · #Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques #Advanced Neural Network Applications #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods #cs.CV

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.11549

openalex publication_date 2020/05/23 · arxiv created 2020/06/27 · arxiv updated 2020/06/30 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

In the object detection task, merging various datasets from similar contexts but with different sets of Objects of Interest (OoI) is an inexpensive way (in terms of labor cost) for crafting a large-scale dataset covering a wide range of objects. Moreover, merging datasets allows us to train one integrated object detector, instead of training several ones, which in turn resulting in the reduction of computational and time costs. However, merging the datasets from similar contexts causes samples with partial labeling as each constituent dataset is originally annotated for its own set of OoI and ignores to annotate those objects that are become interested after merging the datasets. With the goal of training one integrated robust object detector with high generalization performance, we propose a training framework to overcome missing-label challenge of the merged datasets. More specifically, we propose a computationally efficient self-supervised framework to create on-the-fly pseudo-labels for the unlabeled positive instances in the merged dataset in order to train the object detector jointly on both ground truth and pseudo labels. We evaluate our proposed framework for training Yolo on a simulated merged dataset with missing rate ≈ 48% using VOC2012 and VOC2007. We empirically show that generalization performance of Yolo trained on both ground truth and the pseudo-labels created by our method is on average 4% higher than the ones trained only with the ground truth labels of the merged dataset.

Citations

Related