vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Balancing Reconstruction Quality and Regularisation in ELBO for VAEs

2019/09/09 by Shu‐Yu Lin, Shuyu Lin, Lin, Shuyu +6 · 2 citations
Computer Science · Engineering · Mathematics · #Advancements in Photolithography Techniques #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Non-Destructive Testing Techniques #cs.CV #cs.LG #stat.ML

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.03765

8 pages for main contents and 15 pages for supplemental materials that include data pre-processing, model architectures and more results

arxiv created 2019/09/09 · openalex publication_date 2019/09/09 · arxiv updated 2019/09/10 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

A trade-off exists between reconstruction quality and the prior regularisation in the Evidence Lower Bound (ELBO) loss that Variational Autoencoder (VAE) models use for learning. There are few satisfactory approaches to deal with a balance between the prior and reconstruction objective, with most methods dealing with this problem through heuristics. In this paper, we show that the noise variance (often set as a fixed value) in the Gaussian likelihood p(x|z) for real-valued data can naturally act to provide such a balance. By learning this noise variance so as to maximise the ELBO loss, we automatically obtain an optimal trade-off between the reconstruction error and the prior constraint on the posteriors. This variance can be interpreted intuitively as the necessary noise level for the current model to be the best explanation of the observed dataset. Further, by allowing the variance inference to be more flexible it can conveniently be used as an uncertainty estimator for reconstructed or generated samples. We demonstrate that optimising the noise variance is a crucial component of VAE learning, and showcase the performance on MNIST, Fashion MNIST and CelebA datasets. We find our approach can significantly improve the quality of generated samples whilst maintaining a smooth latent-space manifold to represent the data. The method also offers an indication of uncertainty in the final generative model.

Citations

Cited by

Related