vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Comparative survey of visual object classifiers

2018/06/17 by Hiliwi Leake Kidane, Kidane, Hiliwi Leake
Computer Science · Engineering · #Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #FOS: Electrical engineering #Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques #Image and Video Processing (eess.IV) #Remote-Sensing Image Classification #electronic engineering #information engineering

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1806.06321

openalex publication_date 2018/06/17 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Classification of Visual Object Classes represents one of the most elaborated areas of interest in Computer Vision. It is always challenging to get one specific detector, descriptor or classifier that provides the expected object classification result. Consequently, it critical to compare the different detection, descriptor and classifier methods available and chose a single or combination of two or three to get an optimal result. In this paper, we have presented a comparative survey of different feature descriptors and classifiers. From feature descriptors, SIFT (Sparse & Dense) and HeuSIFT combination colour descriptors; From classification techniques, Support Vector Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbor, ADABOOST, and fisher are covered in comparative practical implementation survey.

Related