2017/05/08 by Noam Brown, Tüomas Sandholm, Brown, Noam +1 · 9 citations
Computer Science · Social Sciences · #Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) #Artificial Intelligence in Games #Computer Science and Game Theory (cs.GT) #Digital Games and Media #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.02955
openalex publication_date 2017/05/08 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
In imperfect-information games, the optimal strategy in a subgame may depend on the strategy in other, unreached subgames. Thus a subgame cannot be solved in isolation and must instead consider the strategy for the entire game as a whole, unlike perfect-information games. Nevertheless, it is possible to first approximate a solution for the whole game and then improve it by solving individual subgames. This is referred to as subgame solving. We introduce subgame-solving techniques that outperform prior methods both in theory and practice. We also show how to adapt them, and past subgame-solving techniques, to respond to opponent actions that are outside the original action abstraction; this significantly outperforms the prior state-of-the-art approach, action translation. Finally, we show that subgame solving can be repeated as the game progresses down the game tree, leading to far lower exploitability. These techniques were a key component of Libratus, the first AI to defeat top humans in heads-up no-limit Texas hold'em poker.