Input modality matters: A comparison of touch, speech, and gesture based in-vehicle interaction

2022/12/29 by Tingru Zhang, Xing Liu, Weisheng Zeng +3 · 43 citations
Engineering · Medicine · Psychology · #Artificial intelligence #Baseline (sea) #Collision #Computer science #Computer security #Driving simulator #Gesture #Human-Automation Interaction and Safety #Human–computer interaction #Interaction #Machine learning #Medical emergency #Medicine #Modalities #Modality (human–computer interaction) #Physical medicine and rehabilitation #Poison control #Psychology #Safety Warnings and Signage #Simulation #Touchscreen #Traffic and Road Safety

paper · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103958

published in Applied Ergonomics 108, 103958 (Elsevier BV)

openalex publication_date 2022/12/29 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/25

Cited by

• A review of in-vehicle touchscreen safety and usability
• Comparative Analysis of Teleportation and Joystick Locomotion in Virtual Reality Navigation with Different Postures: A Comprehensive Examination of Mental Workload
• Assessment of Drivers' Mental Workload by Multimodal Measures during Auditory-Based Dual-Task Driving Scenarios. [europepmc]
• An empirical study on new-energy vehicle users' preferences of in-vehicle interaction input methods. [europepmc]
• Assessing driver distraction from in-vehicle information system: an on-road study exploring the effects of input modalities and secondary task types. [europepmc]