2025/07/18 by Nico Föge, Markus Pauly, Föge, Nico +1
Computer Science · Mathematics · #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques #Machine Learning in Healthcare #Methodology (stat.ME) #Statistical Methods and Inference
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.13918
openalex publication_date 2025/07/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Random Forests are renowned for their predictive accuracy, but valid inference, particularly about permutation-based feature importances, remains challenging. Existing methods, such as the confidence intervals (CIs) from Ishwaran et al. (2019), are promising but assume complete feature observation. However, real-world data often contains missing values. In this paper, we investigate how common imputation techniques affect the validity of Random Forest permutation-importance CIs when data are incomplete. Through an extensive simulation and real-world benchmark study, we compare state-of-the-art imputation methods across various missing-data mechanisms and missing rates. Our results show that single-imputation strategies lead to low CI coverage. As a remedy, we adapt Rubin's rule to aggregate feature-importance estimates and their variances over several imputed datasets and account for imputation uncertainty. Our numerical results indicate that the adjusted CIs achieve better nominal coverage.