2026/06/02 by S Hoffmann, Tim Morris, Moritz Herrmann +24 · 2 voices · 1 citation
Mathematics · Social Sciences · #Census and Population Estimation #Data Analysis and Archiving #Data collection #Key (lock) #MEDLINE #Survey Methodology and Nonresponse #Text mining
paper · doi:10.1136/bmj-2025-087812
published in BMJ 393, e087812
openalex publication_date 2026/06/02 · openalex created_date 2026/06/03 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
Increasing availability of large routinely collected datasets presents many possibilities to answer more questions about health and disease, and at a faster pace. These opportunities are exciting, but, without the necessary expertise, well intentioned researchers can unwittingly fall into traps that make their work indistinguishable from that of less well meaning researchers. This article describes important challenges that arise in the analysis of routinely collected data and offers mitigation strategies to improve the trustworthiness of experimental and observational studies with the aim of explanation or prediction using classical statistical methods or AI algorithms. It also provides a roadmap to support researchers in conducting analyses on routinely collected data that produce more reliable estimates.