vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available: Table 1.

2016/03/18 by Miguel A. Hernán, James M. Robins · 2,865 citations
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · #Advanced Causal Inference Techniques #Artificial intelligence #Big data #Causal inference #Computer science #Counterfactual thinking #Data mining #Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life #Inference #Medicine #Observational methods in psychology #Observational study #Psychology #Randomized controlled trial #Randomized experiment #Social psychology #Statistical Methods and Inference #Surgery #Table (database)

paper · pdf · doi:10.1093/aje/kwv254

published in American Journal of Epidemiology 183(8), 758-764 (Oxford University Press)

openalex publication_date 2016/03/18 · openalex created_date 2016/06/24 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

Ideally, questions about comparative effectiveness or safety would be answered using an appropriately designed and conducted randomized experiment. When we cannot conduct a randomized experiment, we analyze observational data. Causal inference from large observational databases (big data) can be viewed as an attempt to emulate a randomized experiment-the target experiment or target trial-that would answer the question of interest. When the goal is to guide decisions among several strategies, causal analyses of observational data need to be evaluated with respect to how well they emulate a particular target trial. We outline a framework for comparative effectiveness research using big data that makes the target trial explicit. This framework channels counterfactual theory for comparing the effects of sustained treatment strategies, organizes analytic approaches, provides a structured process for the criticism of observational studies, and helps avoid common methodologic pitfalls.

Cited by

Related