vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Purported quantitative support for multiple introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into humans is an artefact of an imbalanced hypothesis testing framework

2025/02/27 by Angus McCowan, McCowan, Angus · 5 voices · 1 citation
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Mathematics · Medicine · #Alternative hypothesis #COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies #COVID-19 epidemiological studies #Inference #SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research #Statistical hypothesis testing #Test (biology) #q-bio.QM

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.20076

openalex publication_date 2025/02/27 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

A prominent report claimed substantial support for two introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into humans using a calculation that combined phylodynamic inferences and epidemic models. Inspection of the calculation identifies an imbalance in the hypothesis testing framework that confounds this result; the single-introduction model was tested against more stringent conditions than the two-introduction model. Here, I show that when the two-introduction model is tested against the same conditions, the support disappears.

Cited by

Discussions

Related