2011/05/12 by Brian Williams, Williams, Brian G., Christopher Dye +1
Mathematics · Medicine · #COVID-19 epidemiological studies #FOS: Biological sciences #Malaria Research and Control #Mosquito-borne diseases and control #Quantitative Methods (q-bio.QM)
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1105.2559
openalex publication_date 2011/05/12 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
In a study of the heterogeneity in malaria infection rates among children Smith et al.1 fitted several mathematical models to data from community studies in Africa. They concluded that 20% of children receive 80% of infections, that infections last about six months on average, that children who clear infections are not immune to new infections, and that the sensitivity and specificity of microscopy for the detection of malaria parasites are 95.8% and 88.4%, respectively. These findings would have important implications for disease control, but we show here that the statistical analysis is unsound and that the data do not support their conclusions.