vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Deep Learning Face Representation by Joint Identification-Verification

2014/06/18 by Yi Sun, Xiaogang Wang, Sun, Yi +3 · 1 voice · 1,792 citations
Computer Science · Engineering · #Artificial intelligence #Biometric Identification and Security #Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV) #Computer science #Convolutional neural network #Deep learning #Engineering #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Face (sociological concept) #Face and Expression Recognition #Face recognition and analysis #Facial recognition system #Feature (linguistics) #Feature extraction #Identification (biology) #Identity (music) #Key (lock) #Machine learning #Pattern recognition (psychology) #Representation (politics) #Task (project management) #Task analysis #cs.CV

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1406.4773

published in arXiv (Cornell University) 27, 1988-1996 (Cornell University)

arxiv created 2014/06/18 · openalex publication_date 2014/06/18 · arxiv published 2014/06/18 · arxiv updated 2014/06/18 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/05

Abstract

The key challenge of face recognition is to develop effective feature representations for reducing intra-personal variations while enlarging inter-personal differences. In this paper, we show that it can be well solved with deep learning and using both face identification and verification signals as supervision. The Deep IDentification-verification features (DeepID2) are learned with carefully designed deep convolutional networks. The face identification task increases the inter-personal variations by drawing DeepID2 extracted from different identities apart, while the face verification task reduces the intra-personal variations by pulling DeepID2 extracted from the same identity together, both of which are essential to face recognition. The learned DeepID2 features can be well generalized to new identities unseen in the training data. On the challenging LFW dataset, 99.15% face verification accuracy is achieved. Compared with the best deep learning result on LFW, the error rate has been significantly reduced by 67%.

Citations

Cited by

Discussions

Related