2025/01/27 by David Ciplet · 1 voice · 2 citations
Environmental Science · Mathematics · Social Sciences · #Climate Change and Geoengineering #Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration #Climate change #Climate justice #Criminology #Ecology #Economic Justice #Economics #Environmental Justice and Health Disparities #Environmental justice #Geography #Inequality #Law #Law and economics #Lock (firearm) #Mathematics #Natural resource economics #Political science #Sociology
paper · doi:10.1080/09644016.2025.2457836
published in Environmental Politics 35(2), 218-239 (Taylor & Francis)
openalex publication_date 2025/01/27 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22
The concept of carbon lock-in has been applied to the infrastructure, institutions, and discourses that lock society into carbon technologies, and simultaneously lock out lower-carbon alternatives. However, climate transitions have implications that extend beyond carbon and related environmental considerations. Systems of social inequality are also inextricably linked to and impacted by climate change governance and related actions. This article develops a framework to analyze inequality lock-in and disruption as part of climate transitions in particular sectors or industries. We conceptualize four distinct forms of climate transitions in relation to inequality: decarbonization lock-in, adaptation lock-in, decarbonization disruption, and adaptation disruption. Moreover, the framework conceptualizes the material mechanisms through which inequality is locked-in, or alternatively, disrupted by climate actions. Applying this framework to analyze the case of incarceration in the United States suggests that decarbonization and climate adaptation policies and practices are currently weighted toward further locking-in inequality in carceral systems.