2024/11/01 by Joel Millward-Hopkins, Yamina Saheb, Jason Hickel · 1 voice · 10 citations
Economics, Econometrics and Finance · Environmental Science · Mathematics · #Climate Change Policy and Economics #Climate Change and Geoengineering #Distributive justice #Distributive property #Economic Justice #Economics #Environmental economics #Inequality #Law #Mathematics #Political science #Pure mathematics #Sociology #Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
paper · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103813
published in Energy Research & Social Science 118, 103813 (Elsevier BV)
openalex publication_date 2024/11/01 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/22
Existing global climate mitigation scenarios perpetuate large inequalities in energy and income between countries and regions for the rest of the century, and modellers have recently begun to assess these dynamics in light of distributive justice theories. However, these theories are intended to describe inequalities within nations and cannot straightforwardly be applied to inequalities between nations or world regions. Indeed, an analysis of key distributive justice theories suggests that, in contexts of international or interregional inequalities, moral justifications for inequality cannot be sustained, while arguments in favour of egalitarianism become stronger.