Criteria for Bibliographic Databases in a Well-Functioning Scholarly Communication and Research Assessment Ecosystem
2025/01/14 by Virginia Barbour, Caitlin Carter, Jonathon Alexis Coates +10 · 5 voices · 1 citation
Computer Science · Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · Decision Sciences · #Semantic Web and Ontologies #Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies #Scientific Computing and Data Management
paper · doi:10.54900/d3ck1-skq19
Abstract
There is much to celebrate when it comes to recent developments in scholarly communication and research assessment. The scholarly communication landscape shows many promising initiatives, including a growing use of preprint services, open access repositories, and open peer review platforms, as well as an increasing interest in more equitable scholarly publishing models such as diamond open access and Subscribe to Open.
Cited by
Discussions
- Last Tuesday an opinion piece authored by me and a number of great colleagues was published on the @force11.bsky.social #Upstream blog. Our piece introduces criteria for innovation-friendly bibliograp [bsky, 20 points, 1 comments]
- This post (doi.org/10.54900/d3c...) challenges current practices of selective databases such as Scopus and Web of Science and argues that these practices inhibit innovation in scholarly communication. [bsky, 12 points, 1 comments]
- Criteria for Bibliographic Databases in a Well-Functioning Scholarly Communication and Research Assessment Ecosystem - New post on Upstream: doi.org/10.54900/d3c... [bsky, 7 points, 0 comments]
- Bibliographic databases can make or break your research innovation! ⬇️
This article by @ginnybarbour.bsky.social et al. explains how databases like #WebofScience & #Scopus hinder platforms like @eli [bsky, 5 points, 0 comments]
- New post on the @force11.bsky.social Upstream blog: doi.org/10.54900/d3c... [bsky, 0 points, 0 comments]
Related