Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World
2021/03/12 by Raminta Pranckutė · 29 citations
Computer Science · Decision Sciences · #Research Data Management Practices #Web visibility and informetrics #scientometrics and bibliometrics research
paper · pdf · doi:10.3390/publications9010012
openalex publication_date 2021/03/12 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/31
Abstract
Nowadays, the importance of bibliographic databases (DBs) has increased enormously, as they are the main providers of publication metadata and bibliometric indicators universally used both for research assessment practices and for performing daily tasks. Because the reliability of these tasks firstly depends on the data source, all users of the DBs should be able to choose the most suitable one. Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus are the two main bibliographic DBs. The comprehensive evaluation of the DBs’ coverage is practically impossible without extensive bibliometric analyses or literature reviews, but most DBs users do not have bibliometric competence and/or are not willing to invest additional time for such evaluations. Apart from that, the convenience of the DB’s interface, performance, provided impact indicators and additional tools may also influence the users’ choice. The main goal of this work is to provide all of the potential users with an all-inclusive description of the two main bibliographic DBs by gathering the findings that are presented in the most recent literature and information provided by the owners of the DBs at one place. This overview should aid all stakeholders employing publication and citation data in selecting the most suitable DB.
Citations
- ‘Predatory’ open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics
- The data source of this study is Web of Science Core Collection? Not enough
- Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources
- Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity
- Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review
- Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies
- A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers
- Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations
- Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: a multidisciplinary comparison of coverage via citations
- Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic
Cited by
Related
- A tale of two databases: The use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers
- Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies
- From indexation policies through citation networks to normalized citation impacts: Web of Science, Scopus, and Dimensions as varying resonance chambers
- Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic
- Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic