2021/04/03 by Margaretha A. van Es, Nina ter Laan, Erik Meinema · 25 citations
Psychology · Social Sciences · #Gender studies #History #Islam #Law #Loyalty #Moderation #Muslim world #Political Conflict and Governance #Political radicalism #Political science #Politics #Psychology #Religion, Society, and Development #Social psychology #Sociology #Sovereignty #Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence #Variety (cybernetics)
paper · pdf · doi:10.1080/0048721x.2021.1865616
published in Religion 51(2), 161-168 (Taylor & Francis)
openalex publication_date 2021/04/03 · openalex created_date 2021/04/13 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Muslims are increasingly conceived through a binary frame of ‘radical’ versus ‘moderate’. In this thematic issue, we critically explore how the dichotomy of ‘radical’ versus ‘moderate’ is constructed and mobilized in different Muslim majority and Muslim minority settings across the world, and we examine the active role played by Muslims in upholding, appropriating, and/or subverting this binary frame. How do Muslims present themselves, their religion, and other Muslim groups amidst growing concerns about the dangers of ‘radical’ Islam – not only through texts, but also through a wide variety of aesthetic practices? And how do discourses about national sovereignty, loyalty, and belonging feed into these representations? This issue brings together scholars from various disciplines, who analyze how the ‘politics of moderation’ play out in Kenya, Norway, Russia, Morocco, Indonesia, and Egypt. We also call for the development of new pathways of thinking about Islam and Muslims in the contemporary world.