2001/08/01 by Nancy Lee Peluso, Peter Vandergeest · 9 citations
Social Sciences · Environmental Science · #Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies #Asian Studies and History #Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
paper · doi:10.2307/2700109
How have national and state governments the world over come to “own” huge expanses of territory under the rubric of “national forest,” “national parks,” or “wastelands”? The two contradictory statements in the above epigraph illustrate that not all colonial administrators agreed that forests should be taken away from local people and “protected” by the state. The assumption of state authority over forests is based on a relatively recent convergence of historical circumstances. These circumstances have enabled certain state authorities to supersede the rights, claims, and practices of people resident in what the world now calls “forests.”