2015/11/03 by Karl Gustafsson · 28 citations
Mathematics · Psychology · Social Sciences · #Artificial intelligence #Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography #Biometrics #Business #China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations #Computer science #Denial #Global Peace and Security Dynamics #International trade #Mathematics #Mutual recognition #Outcome (game theory) #Political science #Psychology #Signature recognition #Social psychology #Social recognition
paper · pdf · doi:10.1177/0010836715610594
published in Cooperation and Conflict 51(3), 255-271 (SAGE Publishing)
openalex publication_date 2015/11/03 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/23
Research on recognition in International Relations has demonstrated that states are not exclusively concerned about their physical security, but also anxious to be recognised by other states. What counts as recognition and non-/mis-recognition, however, is not always clear. Scholars of recognition seem to agree that recognition theory has not yet developed a persuasive way of recognising recognition. Providing a satisfactory answer to the question of how we recognise recognition and its denial is a necessary first step towards being able to convincingly theorise about recognition. This is especially important since recognition is often treated as a dependent variable—how states are recognised by other states is seen as influencing their behaviour, sometimes with military conflict as the outcome. This article further develops the concepts of ‘thin’ and ‘thick’ recognition as it addresses the problem of how to recognise recognition. Based on an analysis of empirical material on what, in Japan, has been interpreted as Chinese non- and mis-recognition of Japan, the article shows how concrete expressions of thin and thick recognition between established states can be recognised.