vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Are We Done with MMLU?

2024/06/06 by Aryo Pradipta Gema, Joshua Ong Jun Leang, Gema, Aryo Pradipta +29 · 5 voices · 77 citations
Computer Science · #Business #Natural Language Processing Techniques #Text Readability and Simplification #Topic Modeling

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.04127

published in arXiv (Cornell University) (Cornell University)

openalex publication_date 2024/06/06 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

Maybe not. We identify and analyse errors in the popular Massive Multitask Language Understanding (MMLU) benchmark. Even though MMLU is widely adopted, our analysis demonstrates numerous ground truth errors that obscure the true capabilities of LLMs. For example, we find that 57% of the analysed questions in the Virology subset contain errors. To address this issue, we introduce a comprehensive framework for identifying dataset errors using a novel error annotation protocol. Then, we create MMLU-Redux, which is a subset of 5,700 manually re-annotated questions across all 57 MMLU subjects. We estimate that 6.49% of MMLU questions contain errors. Using MMLU-Redux, we demonstrate significant discrepancies with the model performance metrics that were originally reported. Our results strongly advocate for revising MMLU's error-ridden questions to enhance its future utility and reliability as a benchmark. https://huggingface.co/datasets/edinburgh-dawg/mmlu-redux-2.0.

Cited by

Discussions

Related