vix.ing · top · new · best · stats · spec

Common Diffusion Noise Schedules and Sample Steps are Flawed

2023/05/15 by Shanchuan Lin, Bingchen Liu, Lin, Shanchuan +5 · 3 voices · 26 citations
Computer Science · Medicine · #Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications #Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis #Image and Signal Denoising Methods #cs.CV

paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.08891

openalex publication_date 2023/05/15 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28

Abstract

We discover that common diffusion noise schedules do not enforce the last timestep to have zero signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and some implementations of diffusion samplers do not start from the last timestep. Such designs are flawed and do not reflect the fact that the model is given pure Gaussian noise at inference, creating a discrepancy between training and inference. We show that the flawed design causes real problems in existing implementations. In Stable Diffusion, it severely limits the model to only generate images with medium brightness and prevents it from generating very bright and dark samples. We propose a few simple fixes: (1) rescale the noise schedule to enforce zero terminal SNR; (2) train the model with v prediction; (3) change the sampler to always start from the last timestep; (4) rescale classifier-free guidance to prevent over-exposure. These simple changes ensure the diffusion process is congruent between training and inference and allow the model to generate samples more faithful to the original data distribution.

Cited by

Discussions

Related