vix.ing · top · new · best · stats

Model Cards for Model Reporting

2018/10/05 by Margaret Mitchell, Simone Wu, Andrew Zaldivar +6 · 6 voices · 1,829 citations
Computer Science · Social Sciences · #Artificial Intelligence in Law #Context (archaeology) #Data modeling #Documentation #Ethics and Social Impacts of AI #Focus (optics) #Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data #Transparency (behavior) #Variety (cybernetics) #cs.AI #cs.LG

paper · pdf · doi:10.1145/3287560.3287596

published as FAT* '19: Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, January 29--31, 2019, Atlanta, GA, USA

openalex created_date 2018/10/26 · openalex publication_date 2019/01/09 · arxiv created 2019/01/14 · arxiv updated 2019/01/16 · openalex updated_date 2026/08/06

Abstract

Trained machine learning models are increasingly used to perform high-impact tasks in areas such as law enforcement, medicine, education, and employment. In order to clarify the intended use cases of machine learning models and minimize their usage in contexts for which they are not well suited, we recommend that released models be accompanied by documentation detailing their performance characteristics. In this paper, we propose a framework that we call model cards, to encourage such transparent model reporting. Model cards are short documents accompanying trained machine learning models that provide benchmarked evaluation in a variety of conditions, such as across different cultural, demographic, or phenotypic groups (e.g., race, geographic location, sex, Fitzpatrick skin type [15]) and intersectional groups (e.g., age and race, or sex and Fitzpatrick skin type) that are relevant to the intended application domains. Model cards also disclose the context in which models are intended to be used, details of the performance evaluation procedures, and other relevant information. While we focus primarily on human-centered machine learning models in the application fields of computer vision and natural language processing, this framework can be used to document any trained machine learning model. To solidify the concept, we provide cards for two supervised models: One trained to detect smiling faces in images, and one trained to detect toxic comments in text. We propose model cards as a step towards the responsible democratization of machine learning and related artificial intelligence technology, increasing transparency into how well artificial intelligence technology works. We hope this work encourages those releasing trained machine learning models to accompany model releases with similar detailed evaluation numbers and other relevant documentation.

Citations

Cited by

Discussions

Related