Ultrametric trees or phylograms for ancestral state reconstruction: Does it matter?

2014/08/01 by Natalie Cusimano, Susanne S. Renner
Agricultural and Biological Sciences · Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology · #Plant and animal studies #Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions #Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies

paper · doi:10.12705/634.14

Abstract

Supplementary Material The Electronic Supplement (Appendix S1: Detailed Methods; Appendix S2: Detailed Results; Figs. S1–S13) is available in the Supplementary Data section of the online version of this article Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Citations

• TESTING FOR PHYLOGENETIC SIGNAL IN COMPARATIVE DATA: BEHAVIORAL TRAITS ARE MORE LABILE

Related

• More Taxa Are Not Necessarily Better for the Reconstruction of Ancestral Character States
• On the accuracy of ancestral sequence reconstruction for ultrametric trees with parsimony
• Analyzing the Accuracy of the Fitch Method for Reconstructing Ancestral States on Ultrametric Phylogenies
• Quantifying the accuracy of ancestral state prediction in a phylogenetic tree under maximum parsimony
• RASP 4: Ancestral State Reconstruction Tool for Multiple Genes and Characters