Problems of Minimal Resistance and the Kakeya Problem

2015/01/01 by Alexander Plakhov
Mathematics · #Advanced Harmonic Analysis Research #Advanced Mathematical Physics Problems #advanced mathematical theories

paper · doi:10.1137/15m1012931

Abstract

Here we solve the problem posed by Comte and Lachand-Robert in [SIAM J. Math. Anal., 34 (2002), pp. 101--120]. Take a bounded domain Ω ⊂ ℝ² and a piecewise smooth nonpositive function u : Ω → ℝ vanishing on ∂Ω. Consider a flow of point particles falling vertically down and reflected elastically from the graph of u. It is assumed that each particle is reflected no more than once (no multiple reflections are allowed); then the resistance of the graph to the flow is expressed as R(u;Ω) = (1)/(|Ω|) ∫_Ω (1 + |∇ u(x)|²)^-1 dx. We need to find inf_Ω,u R(u;Ω). One can easily see that |∇ u(x)| < 1 for all regular x ∈ Ω, and therefore one always has R(u;Ω) > 1/2. We prove that the infimum of R is exactly 1/2. This result is somewhat paradoxical, and the proof is inspired by, and partly similar to, the paradoxical solution given by Besicovitch to the Kakeya problem [Amer. Math. Monthly, 70 (1963), pp. 697--706].

Citations

• Existence of minimizers for Newton's problem of the body of minimal resistance under a single impact assumption
• The Multiplier Problem for the Ball

Related

• The problem of minimal resistance for functions and domains
• Minimal resistance of curves under the single impact assumption
• Newton's problem of minimal resistance under the single-impact\n assumption
• The problem of minimal resistance, old and new
• A note on Newton's problem of minimal resistance for convex bodies