2019/10/04 by Joseph Enguehard, Enguehard, Joseph, Dan Busbridge +5
Computer Science · Social Sciences · #Computation and Language (cs.CL) #FOS: Computer and information sciences #Language and cultural evolution #Machine Learning (cs.LG) #Machine Learning (stat.ML) #Natural Language Processing Techniques #Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE) #Topic Modeling
paper · pdf · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.03492
openalex publication_date 2019/10/04 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/28
The choice of sentence encoder architecture reflects assumptions about how a sentence's meaning is composed from its constituent words. We examine the contribution of these architectures by holding them randomly initialised and fixed, effectively treating them as as hand-crafted language priors, and evaluating the resulting sentence encoders on downstream language tasks. We find that even when encoders are presented with additional information that can be used to solve tasks, the corresponding priors do not leverage this information, except in an isolated case. We also find that apparently uninformative priors are just as good as seemingly informative priors on almost all tasks, indicating that learning is a necessary component to leverage information provided by architecture choice.