2016/01/02 by Didier Caluwaerts, Min Reuchamps
Social Sciences · #E-Government and Public Services #Social Capital and Networks #Social Media and Politics
paper · doi:10.1080/00344893.2016.1244111
openalex publication_date 2016/01/02 · openalex created_date 2025/10/10 · openalex updated_date 2026/07/29
Democratic deliberation is claimed to improve the legitimacy of democratic decision making. However, deliberation’s beneficial effects do not come about easily. If deliberative innovations want to contribute to the legitimacy of political decision making, they have to reflect the principles of legitimacy in their own functioning. In this paper, we set out to assess the input and output legitimacy of four deliberative events, and determine which are the favourable conditions for their legitimacy. Based on a comparison of the British Columbia Citizens’ Assembly, the Belgian G1000, the Dutch Burgerforum, and the Irish We The Citizens, we argue that the institutional embeddedness of deliberative innovations strongly affect their claims to legitimacy, but also that their disruptive potential is unrelated to legitimacy.